Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:16

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does my ex boyfriend do this?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Nonreciprocal light speed control achieved using cavity magnonics device - Phys.org
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Neuroimaging study suggests mindfulness meditation lowers sensory gating - PsyPost
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do you choose sunscreen for oily skin?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sonic Racing CrossWorlds Is a Kart Racing Spectacle That Celebrates Sega’s History - IGN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘Smash’ abruptly announces final show after Tony Awards drama in Broadway shocker - New York Post
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.